Mdeii Life - Anand Krishnamoorthi's blog
This is a post page, visit the
blog mainpagePreviously
Kind Hearts and Coronets
In their own way, things seem to work out
Lessons for us all
Another actress in temple row
Général De Gaulle dirait
I know I'll get kicked for this
Jurgen Jurgen Jurgen
Ignoramii
A couple of authors, a couple of works, and a coup...
Lost History of Tamil King Raja Lakshmi Mittal
Thursday, July 06, 2006
From the Beeb archives
The 2003 Reith Lectures were delivered by Vilayanur Ramachandran.
Of the many plattitudes that I find irritatingly misused, there is one that is understood to assert that analysis and enjoyment are somehow mutually exclusive. அனுபவிக்கணும், ஆராயக்கூடாது. It is a fallacy to think that art and the abstract are better off not dissected, and must only be superficially consumed.
Contrary to popular opinion, I enjoy a film more when I am able to go into its mechnics and workings, and am glad that I have access to an endless supply of films that provide me these thrills.
Ramachandran in his lectures, discussed the blurring between the sciences, the arts, and the humanities; when the 'methods' of science help understand the hitherto inviolable abstact areas of human faculty (as a corrollary, I suppose the 'madness' of art applied to the sciences is what are called 'inspiration' and 'genuis').
Of all the abstracts to analyse, Ramachandran's forte is the human mind: thought, emotion, even the human propensity for illogic.
Enjoy!
Comments to From the Beeb archives
Firstly I have not come across this distinction (as much as you have to call it a platitude).
Obviously, they are not mutually exclusive. Same can be said of Sciences and Arts.
But, I feel they are not the same either. There are so many pieces of art, which demanded no further* analysis or dissection (as in, dissection after the "consumption") than what we directly perceive out of it.
* - which layer is a "further analysis" is actually very subjective.
posted by Anonymous
2:32 pm, July 06, 2006Zero: My understanding of your comment might be limited, but I think you are agreeing with me?
posted by Anand
3:29 pm, July 06, 2006Yeah! :P
Well, I was also trying to say that there are some things - well, let me put it the way I connect to, some films - that do no need further analysis and can actually be relished without further* dissection. Romba olarren'no!
* - Subjective, again.
posted by Anonymous
3:37 pm, July 06, 2006Zero: Yeah! You know what, In fact, in order to validate your assertion (which, is of course, as you say, very subjective) aarraaychiya niruthhidalama? :D
posted by Anand
8:54 pm, July 06, 2006